Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:09:50 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: F_ULOCK, F_LOCK, F_TLOCK, F_TEST missing in unistd.h Message-ID: <20040826090950.GZ27978@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4215658170 DOT 20040826103850 AT familiehaase DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4215658170.20040826103850@familiehaase.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 26 10:38, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello, > > The SUS says these flags belong in unistd.h: > > #define F_ULOCK 0 /* Unlock a previously locked region */ > #define F_LOCK 1 /* Lock a region for exclusive use */ > #define F_TLOCK 2 /* Test and lock a region for exclusive use */ > #define F_TEST 3 /* Test a region for other processes locks */ > > Could this be added? First of all, this is an newlib issue since unistd.h is defined there. However, IMHO that doesn't make much sense, as long as the lockf function and its prototype is missing as well. What do you need these defines for w/o having lockf? Hey, are you going to implement lockf for Cygwin? :-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/