Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen" <_garbage_collector_ AT telia DOT com> To: Subject: RE: sed and dos format Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <412BA662.703AA852@dessent.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Brian wrote: > Regarding efficiency, I am strictly talking about the code path. > Having Cygwin add a \r when the file is written the first time should > be more efficient than reprocessing the whole thing after it's been > processed the first time, or at the least reparsing the lines in an > output filter pipeline to insert \r's. Of course it would be more efficient, but as I wrote previously - one has to have the consequences in mind. > Again my reply was under the > context of "lots of files that *must* remain DOS-mode" where > accidently forgetting a u2d somewhere breaks things just as bad as > some obscure text-mode bug in some app. > > This is beginning to get trollish so I will cease further comment in > this thread. ;-) why is it a troll when you're discussion alternative ways of doing things? I'm not sure whether this is amusing or something else. /Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems --72--> ** mailing list preference; please keep replies on list ** -- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); -- --END OF MESSAGE-- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/