Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Hans Horn" <hannes AT 2horns DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Release candidate: gcc-3.4.1-1
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:34:20 -0700
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <cggj9t$gs7$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <200408241633 DOT i7OGXSf02448 AT esds DOT vss DOT fsi DOT com> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0408241426090 DOT 328 AT fordpc DOT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp65-74-218-106.whfp.phl.wayport.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Group,

just updated to gcc341 and am getting a silly core dump in fortran core.

I'm using the following compile flags:
g77 -c  -O6 -ffast-math -malign-double -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-trapping-math 
 -fexpensive-optimizations -finline-functions -finline-limit=100000 -fstrength-reduce 
 -fgcse -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -march=pentium4 -fno-underscoring 
 -fno-f2c -Wall -Winline -Wunused -Wuninitialized -ffixed-line-length-132 
src.f -o src.o

Adding -mno-cygwin has no effect.

I've narrowed down where shit is happening: in a call to intrinsic min()!
Doesn't happen in a small stand-alone test code.

It also doesn't happen under mingw gcc341.

anybody else observing similar crap?

H.

Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>> I've made a release candidate of gcc 3.4 available for download.
>>
>> NEWS
>> ====
>> Too many changes to list here in detaili.  Please see the official
>> docs at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4 and
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
>
> Should I assume this means my DWARF2 patches are not yet included :-(.
> Just curious if there is any more effective way of bribing, oops..., I
> meant pleading with you ;-).
>
> * http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-06/msg00583.html 




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/