Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:27:02 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Very slow SCSI tape drive with cygwin/Win2kPro Message-ID: <20040824142702.GG27978@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200408231840 DOT 52007 DOT whn AT lopi DOT com> <20040824100453 DOT GF27978 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040824100453.GF27978@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 24 12:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 23 18:40, Bill Nugent wrote: > > mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk 8192 > > tar -tf /dev/nst0 -b 32 > > tar --help, especially the -b option. Uhm... sorry, scratch that. > > Block size does not seem to be a factor. I've tried 8k, 16k and 32k > > (over 32k doesn't work for some reason). I've just tried reading and writing on a Tandberg SLR7 which has a max. speed of 6 MB/s, using 5K blocks on tape. My testcase was a directory of 645 MB, full of source code (lots of small files). Using 10K blocks (-b20) for tar, I got roughly 850 KB/s on write and 1.25 MB/s on read. Using 1000K blocks (-b2000), I got 1.4MB/s on write and nearly the full 6 MB/s on read. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/