Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:00:49 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: socket() call failing?
Message-ID: <20040818220049.GU10590@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20040818192547 DOT GE8110 AT nerd-marrow DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040818192547.GE8110@nerd-marrow.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Aug 18 15:25, Jay Fenlason wrote:
> I've been trying to debug why Amanda won't work under cygwin for me
> any more, and I've traced it down to a socket() call in the sendbackup
> program.  strace shows the following (massively snipped)
> 
>   709  258623 [main] sendbackup 628 cygwin_socket: socket (2, 1, 6)
> 79416  338039 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: res 0
>   281  338320 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: wVersion 514
>   140  338460 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: wHighVersion 514
>   352  338812 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: szDescription WinSock 2.0
>   147  338959 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: szSystemStatus Running
>   134  339093 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: iMaxSockets 0
>   135  339228 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: iMaxUdpDg 0
>   138  339366 [main] sendbackup 628 wsock_init: lpVendorInfo 0
>  8525  347891 [main] sendbackup 628 __set_winsock_errno: cygwin_socket:602 - winsock error 10106 -> errno 1
>   263  348154 [main] sendbackup 628 cygwin_socket: -1 = socket (2, 1, 6)
> 
> but I've no clue how to debug further than this.  The socket call
> socket ( PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP )
> looks OK to me. . .

Does the parent process reduce the environment to some bare minimum?
Check if the child process still has $SYSTEMROOT set.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/