Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <4106A22B.2030308@tlinx.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:42:51 -0700
From: linda w <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: "find" memory(handle) leak, / problem...proc related, (don't do this at home! :-))
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Among my maint process run each night one deletes old tmp files and
finds them using 'find'.

When I ran it yesterday, I was using process exporer to try to monitor it
but Proxexp couldn't dispay the lower panel when selected for displaying
handles....then I config'ed it to display # of handles in the upper panel.

I saw it have over 40 thousand handles open before I gave up trying to
monitor it.

At first, on a rerun, I noted it had several handles to processes that no
longer existed.  Possibly having some function similar to the old zombie
processes on *nix.  This list slowly seemed to grow over time...then it 
jumped
to around 800+...that's when I noticed a bunch of handles to all of the 
registry
keys under the classes. 

Right now, I am not able to track it, as the number
of handles has jumped to 91,138.  If I wasn't on an NT based OS (XP), the
process would have likely terminated at this point.  I guess #of handles
isn't limited to 64K/process anymore either! :-)

Just a guess, but maybe find is doing a breadth first search on the
registry-fs in proc?  The zombie-process handles may have been a
red-herring.

I think this has to do with the idea of creating real fs entries
for /proc and /cygwin.  That might not be such a good idea since
one can always give /proc on the cmdline to find to start in and
it will search it then.  Yeikes!....


-linda


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/