Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
Subject: Re: Performance: g++ Cygwin vs. other compilers (copying char[] to vector)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:48:19 +0300
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <cde649$qb4$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <cddooq$ssi$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040718063702 DOT 01f796e8 AT imap DOT myrealbox DOT com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-166-218-207.barak.net.il
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437


"Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org> wrote in message news:6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040718063702 DOT 01f796e8 AT imap DOT myrealbox DOT com...
> At 05:00 AM 7/18/2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >How to explain so considerable difference in performance: g++ Cygwin vs.
> >other compilers in tests below?
[snip]

> I don't find your compile options, or whether you have profiled.  For g++
> under cygwin,
[snip]

g++ *.cpp -o cps_cyg.exe   // g++ Cygwin
g++ -mno-cygwin *.cpp -o cps_mgw.exe  // g++ Mingw
gpp *.cpp -o cps_dj.exe  // g++ Djgpp
cl /EHsc *.cpp -o cps_ms.exe   // C++ Microsoft
dmc -I. -IC:/dm/stlport/stlport -Ae *.cpp -o cps_dm.exe  // C++ Digital Mars

[snip]


-- 
   Alex Vinokur
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
     http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn








--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/