Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20040715075229.008a6dd0@incoming.verizon.net> X-Sender: vze1u1tg AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:52:29 -0400 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Pierre A. Humblet" Subject: Re: sending email from Cygwin In-Reply-To: <20040715081800.GC19753@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20040714234445 DOT ABA0C84C1E AT pessard DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20040715010020 DOT GA296325 AT Worldnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 10:18 AM 7/15/2004 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jul 15 01:39, Robert R Schneck wrote: >> Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >> >Luke Kendall wrote: >> >> or that it creates a symlink to sendmail. >> > >> > exim doesn't. That symlink is created by the cygwin specific exim-config >> > script under explicit user control. That avoids possible conflicts with >> > postinstall scripts. >> >> Hmmm. So perhaps the appropriate new behavior for ssmtp is to do the >> same thing, asking the user whether to create such a link in the >> ssmtp-config. I think so. Anyone else advise otherwise? > >That's a good point. Yes, I guess ssmtp-config should do that, the same >way as the exim-config script (perhaps you can just use Pierre's code. >Would that be ok, Pierre?). Sure. Let me know if you improve it. Pierre -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/