Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Cygwin List'" Subject: [OT] RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:13:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.0.20040712173013.033473d0@pop.prospeed.net> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2004 22:13:47.0140 (UTC) FILETIME=[80903C40:01C4685D] > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall > Sent: 12 July 2004 22:40 > To: Hannu E K Nevalainen; Cygwin List > Subject: RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll > >FWIW: > >Seems there is still something "wrong" with your > configuration, a "Reply to > >All" on the message (as quoted above) of yours yields > > "Cygwin List; Dave Korn" in the TO field (Dave shouldn't be > there IMO). > > > That's not wrong. A "Reply to All" means reply to all who > were originally > addressed. Since the original came from David and he > (apparently) didn't > set his "Reply-To" (which Eudora will honor) to the list (for > example), he > is correctly included in the "Reply to All". Absolutely so. It doesn't matter to me, Ouchlook seems to manage to identify dupes (by the msg-id presumably) and I only see one copy anyway. So I don't bother with Reply-To: cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/