Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:16:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw E-mail Addresses In Your Replies. Message-ID: <20040712171624.GC9940@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040712165339 DOT 22641 DOT qmail AT web52208 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040712165339.22641.qmail@web52208.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:53:39AM -0700, Elvin Peterson wrote: >--- Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote: >> >> > --- Larry Hall wrote: >> > > Lots of email clients do this automatically. >> > >>>This should be done server side, by the mailing list manager. If you >>>subscribe to any of the sourceforge lists, you will know that they do >>>this automatically. Much better than requesting each person to do it >>>everytime (something always gets through and then it is spam city). >> >>This wasn't an arbitrary decision. Both ways have been tried, and, in >>general, it was not possible to reliably munge e-mail addresses (and >>*only* e-mail addresses) in the archived messages. This garbled the >>message contents, and so was turned off. The headers are still >>munged... >> >>There might be a way to find and match just the reply lead-ins (e.g., >>"On some date, John Doe wrote:", or > >This form should cover almost all the cases, and the PCYMTNQREAIYR >messages can be limited to those special cases where violations occur. > >>are varied enough that it's probably not possible. > >I suppose this was an issue a few years ago when people used a large >variety of software, but today most mail readers use the first form. There are a number of people here who use other forms. >From CGF's reply, it seems like a proprietary solution is being used >for mailing list management (this is the point where I would plug Open >Source software :-)), so this whole discussion is rather pointless. It's not proprietary software. It's a perl script, written by me. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/