Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00f601c465a5$f03dd5d0$4e6510ac@ds.tao.co.uk> From: "William Blunn" To: References: Subject: Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?") Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:14:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i69BFEsb022865 > "If you're archiving people's posts for all time, there is a moral > obligation on you to archive them absolutely *verbatim* and not tamper > with, edit, reformat, or otherwise alter them." I wasn't suggesting tampering with them. Information should be preserved where possible. My contention is with the process used to emit those archived messages as web pages. Wrapping up e-mail in PRE is bogus because flowed text e-mail is not pre-formatted. Flowed text e-mail requires one very cheap operation (line wrapping) before it can be displayed, one which can, in fact, be carried out in the reader's web browser(!) So in fact there isn't even any load on the server(!) Not only that but the reader's web browser knows how wide the windor is and can wrap it at sensible place (rather than some arbitrary number of characters based on some anachronistic nonsense). A goodly fraction of e-mail is now flowed text, and it will only increase. Ignoring that is like sticking your head in the sand. Bill -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/