Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:17:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: higher-level IO very slow with cygwin1.dll 5.10 (due to set_flags?) Message-ID: <20040628031711.GA17390@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040626154504 DOT GA961349 AT hpn5170x> <20040626160554 DOT GA980221 AT hpn5170x> <20040626170940 DOT GD20063 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20040626174145 DOT GA1032441 AT hpn5170x> <20040627194205 DOT GA10371 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20040627212949 DOT GA176017 AT Worldnet> <20040627234350 DOT GA13744 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:52:29PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:50PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>>Your change makes getc work almost as fast a getc_unlocked. >>>This is on Win98. Yesterday's results were on WinME, where the >>>differences were larger. That hard drive died this morning :( >> >>Sorry to hear that. I've been going through hard disk problems >>myself. > >Is Cygwin killing hard drives ? In my case, the hard drive has never seen cygwin, even the cygwin source code, so if it is, it would be action at a distance. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/