Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.10: Possible bug Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:09:10 -0700 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <40D6C0D8 DOT 8070207 AT phenix DOT fr> <20040621203006 DOT GA8404 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-68-120-146-125.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Thunderbird/0.7 Mnenhy/0.6.0.101 In-Reply-To: <20040621203006.GA8404@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Christopher Faylor wrote: > So, if anyone is under the impression that this is just a > lack of time, that is not the case, at least for me, and, I suspect that > Corinna is in the same boat. Agreed. This is basically a special-purpose issue, so the onus is on us to figure out what can be done. The times it has come up to bite the average user are few and far in between. In particular, the tcl/tk fiasco is the only one that has bitten a significant number of people, and mostly because the Cygwin tcl package doesn't follow the Cygwin convention of prefixing the DLL names with "cyg" (i.e. instead of "cygtcl84.dll", it's just "tcl84.dll", and it ends up getting picked up by programs that try to dynamically load a TCL scripting engine). So anyway, to cut a long story short, I agree with cgf :-). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/