Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: "'cygwin'" Subject: RE: ssh become slower and slower? Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:19:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <40CF5EA0.D47EFF26@hot.pl> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2004 09:19:33.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[092F1C00:01C45383] Note-from-DJ: This may be spam > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jacek Trzmiel > Sent: 15 June 2004 21:40 > Dave Korn wrote: > > You're telling someone to go online and test > their ssh client's > > connection with their firewall and antivirus down? > > > > Is this some kind of really mean practical joke? > > - He can test it on lan while not connected to inet. > - He can have firewall on separate machine (gateway). > - Even without any fw/av, with all security patches applied, there is > small chance of catching anything during short test. > > YMMV. > > Jacek. Fair points. Except for #3, which I really wouldn't want to rely on for a moment. After all, it's often the case that when a new worm breaks out, most machines are up-to-date (with the patches that existed up until that point) and there's a mad scramble to get a new patch out. One packet can be all it takes. I would never expose a naked machine to the internet for any time at all unless I *wanted* it to get something nasty! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/