Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:04:40 +0200
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
Message-ID: <3-591829356.20040616110440@familiehaase.de>
To: Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Annoucement: GCC-3.4.0 binary release candidat
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0406141012180.3560@fordpc.vss.fsi.com>
References: <8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F09B33A AT calttsv025 DOT cal DOT riotinto DOT org> <0-761829503 DOT 20040614115120 AT familiehaase DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0406141012180 DOT 3560 AT fordpc DOT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Brian schrieb:

> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>> I was able to build the whole GCC suite including Pascal, Modula 2, D
>> and also Java without problems now, after I downgraded to  cygwin-1.5.9.
>> Which version of cygwin did you use to build Java?  I'm asking since
>> the Java build fails for me with cygwin-1.5.10-3 and one newer snapshot I
>> tried.

> I'm still trying to get a clean bootstrap with all the languages enabled,
> but could you post your configure line so that I can look into your issue
> above?

Get my script and patch here:
   http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gcc/

The patch includes all changes from gcc-3.3.3 to gcc-3.3.4 plus some
additional changes for the 'cygwin special' version.  There are also
some changes for files in the gcc/d, gcc/p, gcc/gm2 directories which
you may remove or just skip them when applying the patch.  The GPC /
Pascal relevant changes to gcc files should be no problem as long as GPC
isn't defined during compilation.

> Also, are you planning on incorporating the DWARF 2 patch discussed here?

> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-05/msg00608.html

Not for 3.3, once 3.4 is bugfree I want to try if it works.


> I can't tell you how grateful I'd be if you did :-).  The configury in
> that patch does need a newer than released binutils to trigger, though.
> CGF, are you planning on a binutils release anytime soon?  Or Gerrit,
> could you just manually define HAVE_GAS_PE_SECREL32_RELOC?  The patch
> should be really safe as it only adds the ability to use -gdwarf-2.
> Without that flag, nothing should be affected.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/