Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40CF5B57.5865298@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:25:59 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: prime95 adversely affects update on w2k References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 6 DOT 2 DOT 20040614103556 DOT 00adfe78 AT mail DOT actron DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Neil Somos wrote: > I am writing in the hope of saving others some grief. > > Prime95 (http://mersenne.org/) soaks up all available background > CPU cycles while trying to help find large mersenne primes. > > Apparently when it is running, it prevents some or all of the > postinstall activity from completing. (On windows 2000 anyway) > > It is a simple matter to temporarily disable prime95 while > install/updates are taking place, provided one knows that this > is important. If this is indeed true then it's a bug and should be looked into. Prime95 runs at the lowest possible priority level. One of the goals of p95 to have it affect the normal functions of the computer as little as possible, i.e. stay out of the way. Can you narrow it down to any particular package that cannot complete its postinstall? Can you reproduce it in any controlled way? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/