Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: script command
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:27:16 +0100
Message-ID: <276BC857C1919C4B8504F4643E1C179D012EC191@CORPHNXSEXV01.corp.pg.eon.net>
From: "Warren, Matthew \(Retail\)" <Matthew DOT Warren AT Powergen DOT co DOT uk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This list can be very amusing. Surely this is off-topic?

-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf
Of Brian Dessent
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 9:43 PM
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: script command

Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:

> > The point was that your original message had 1 line of signal
> > and 29 lines of noise.
> 
> Um, the original email had a different person's name, different email
> address, and different company disclaimer. The only similarities are
> that it's in the same thread and has a long disclaimer.
> A recent article by a guy that had his attorney look at Time's email
> disclaimer, who found it to be legal nonsense, can be found at

My apologies.  The original question containing a 1:29 SNR was by Mike
Kenny, but the followup I was replying to was by Matthew Warren. 
However, Matthew's reply coincidently contained a good 25 lines of
useless disclaimer spam as well, which is why it appeared to be the same
person to my quick skimming.

> <http://slate.msn.com/id/2101561/<
> 
> That's not stopping a lot of companies from using them, though.

That's a great link.  I cannot understand what compels people to use
these things.  Actually that's not true, I can imagine the clueless
managerial types dictating a "better safe than sorry" policy, even
though the disclaimer is meaningless at best and ridiculous at worst.

What ever happened to the internet where netiquette actually meant
anything?  You know, that whole thing about keeping signatures to less
than 4 lines x 72 chars, not quoting entire messages, not sending HTML
email to public lists, and so on?

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



___________________________ Disclaimer Notice __________________________
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the Powergen Group does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Powergen Group.

Registered addresses:

Powergen UK plc, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England & Wales No. 2366970

Powergen Retail Limited,  Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430

Telephone     +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax                +44 (0) 2476 42 5432


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/