Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:52:11 -0500
From: Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Annoucement: GCC-3.4.0 binary release candidat
Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0406141149570.3560@fordpc.vss.fsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Sorry Gerrit.  I didn't mean for that to be personal email as you can
tell :-(.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:53:29 -0500
From: Brian Ford
Reply-To: cygwin
To: Gerrit P. Haase
Subject: Re: Annoucement: GCC-3.4.0 binary release candidat

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

> I was able to build the whole GCC suite including Pascal, Modula 2, D
> and also Java without problems now, after I downgraded to  cygwin-1.5.9.
> Which version of cygwin did you use to build Java?  I'm asking since
> the Java build fails for me with cygwin-1.5.10-3 and one newer snapshot I
> tried.

I'm still trying to get a clean bootstrap with all the languages enabled,
but could you post your configure line so that I can look into your issue
above?

Also, are you planning on incorporating the DWARF 2 patch discussed here?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-05/msg00608.html

I can't tell you how grateful I'd be if you did :-).  The configury in
that patch does need a newer than released binutils to trigger, though.
CGF, are you planning on a binutils release anytime soon?  Or Gerrit,
could you just manually define HAVE_GAS_PE_SECREL32_RELOC?  The patch
should be really safe as it only adds the ability to use -gdwarf-2.
Without that flag, nothing should be affected.

Thanks a bunch.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot...

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/