Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <cb51e2e04061108485cc9d35e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:48:01 -0700
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: script command
In-Reply-To: <40C9A3AA.76D0B221@dessent.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <276BC857C1919C4B8504F4643E1C179D012EC18F AT CORPHNXSEXV01 DOT corp DOT pg DOT eon DOT net> <40C9A3AA DOT 76D0B221 AT dessent DOT net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> The point was that your original message had 1 line of signal 
> and 29 lines of noise.

Um, the original email had a different person's name, different email
address, and different company disclaimer. The only similarities are
that it's in the same thread and has a long disclaimer.
A recent article by a guy that had his attorney look at Time's email
disclaimer, who found it to be legal nonsense, can be found at

<http://slate.msn.com/id/2101561/<

That's not stopping a lot of companies from using them, though.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/