Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40C9A77A.9060804@luukku.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:37:14 +0300 From: Jani tiainen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6+ (Windows/20040510) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: nice not setting above/below normal References: <1981E79C7C98A547B36D794FBEC5337002967DF6 AT MOSCNTX1> In-Reply-To: <1981E79C7C98A547B36D794FBEC5337002967DF6@MOSCNTX1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mironov, Leonid {PBG} wrote: > If I am to believe windows task manager windows processes can have 6 > priority levels - realtime, high, above normal, normal, below normal and > low, but cygwin nice can set only 2: when -n parameter is above 0 priority > is set to low, when -n is below 0 priority is set to high, actual value of > -n parameter is ignored. Am I missing something or ...? Actually there is four real levels (realtime, high, normal, idle (low)). For 2k and XP there is two more, below normal and above normal. That behaviour might be due the fact that those two additional levels doesn't exists in Win 95, 98, ME or NT4. -- Jani Tiainen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/