Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:25:14 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Visual Studio linking Message-ID: <20040607162514.GB4767@coe.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <001801c4487e$dca77e20$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20040607145637 DOT GB15068 AT coe DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:13:25PM +0100, Alastair Growcott wrote: >>A .def file is generated for cygwin when the DLL is built, actually. > >I'm not building the Cygwin dll, so I need this step. > >>5a) Modify the license of your program to the GNU General Public >>License, since your binary has now become GPLed, meaning that you must >>now offer the source code to your sources under the terms of the GPL. > >My program is non-distributable. I am using it to run unit tests >internally. > >I thought that, under the terms of the GPL, if my binary links >dynamically to the Cygwin DLL, I do NOT have to offer my source code >up, I only need to ensure that people can use my software against >future (or past) versions of Cygwin by rebuilding the DLL themselves. >This includes either distributing the Cygwin DLL source code or >ditributing a link to somewhere they can obtain it. >>5) Download crt0.c from the cygwin website and include it in your >>sources. Modify it to call my_crt0() instead of cygwin_crt0(). You're including crt0.c in your source code. That's not linking dynamically. You are also using a .def file for your linking rather than calling LoadLibrary and cousins. AFAICT, you aren't doing anything differently from what a normal build of a binary using gcc and would do. >Or is that the lesser GPL? > >Surely the source code will not be GPL'ed if I do not make it or the >binary publically available! I suspect that you probably haven't read the GPL FAQ. This section is probably pertinent: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCGPLRequireSourcePostedPublic but the rest should make interesting reading as well. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/