Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen" To: Subject: RE: cygwin gcc performance Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 20:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 6:08 PM > On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Matthieu VIAL wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Could someone explain me why gcc cygwin compiler take so long to build a > > simple hello world program compared with mingw ? > > Cygwin is a POSIX emulation layer. Using the POSIX emulation is bound to > be less efficient than running the native application (which is what the > MinGW gcc is). If you want to know wher ethe time's going, look at the > strace output (don't send it to the list, though, as your times look quite > normal -- I get about 1.6s on my system once gcc is in the disk cache). Well, then it might also depend a bit on HOW you launch mingw-gcc; Matthieu had a strange way to do it. $ time gcc -mno-cygwin -o hw hw.c; \ time gcc -o hw hw.c real 0m2.133s user 0m0.530s sys 0m1.590s real 0m1.932s user 0m0.530s sys 0m1.410s This is in my P2/450... FWIW - just my 0.2 seconds. /Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59+16.37'N, 17+12.60'E --76--> ** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list ** -- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); -- --END OF MESSAGE-- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/