Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: Re[4]: Visual Studio linking Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:54:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2004 13:54:47.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[2ADDAC20:01C448A9] > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alastair Growcott > Sent: 02 June 2004 14:44 > To: cygwin > Subject: Re[4]: Visual Studio linking > > Conclusions: Real Conclusion: You are completely wasting your time in a pointless exercise of cobbling together a bunch of completely incompatible bits of code that just happen to have the same function names. The internals of C runtime libraries and startup code contain deep black magic and you haven't a hope in hell of getting gcc lib bits to play nicely with msvc lib bits. Even if you managed to translate the names, that doesn't mean the functions expect the same data as arguments nor will they use the same data structures in memory. Sorry to be so negative, but it really isn't worth pursuing. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/