Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 12:57:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: dll version collision - my old and now broken solution Message-ID: <20040529165724.GB8840@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <008101c4455f$3d705c40$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008101c4455f$3d705c40$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:27:43AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >Attached is my patch, updated to apply cleanly (though not to work!) >with current CVS. In case it isn't obvious, this patch is just a brute force kludge. Half of the changes aren't even necessary. I'm not sure what the patch buys you over the mechanism used by the test suite but I suspect that the test suite mechanism wasn't even looked at or understood. As Max noted this is not something that is officially supported or sanctioned so if anyone has questions about this patch please send them to Max Bowsher via personal email. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/