Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Marc Schare Subject: Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive. Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.31.185.38 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)) > > Don't use mount. > My only use of the mount command was to demonstrate that Windows and CYGWIN knew about the tape drive. Mount with no parameters doesn't change the mount table, does it? I'm not trying to reassociate the Posix device names, I'm merely attempting to use /dev/st0 as it says in the manual: /dev/st0 \device\tape0, rewind /dev/nst0 \device\tape0, no-rewind According to the book, after a boot, if the system finds a tape drive, Posix applications can get to it by referring to /dev/st0. I can't. Again, the *only* use of the mount command was to try and document the problem. Any other ideas? Thanks! Marc Schare -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/