Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40B5BD6B.63A9DFD7@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 03:05:31 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Looking for new apache maintainer References: <20040525234836 DOT GA2243 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <40B53400 DOT 668ECCEF AT dessent DOT net> <000b01c443cb$c6c0e950$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <40B5B751 DOT 9EB8E456 AT dessent DOT net> <001101c443d0$dee51470$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Max Bowsher wrote: > > I hadn't planned to package 2.x because its native win32 version would > > be significantly faster with a thread MPM than a Cygwin port. But I > > suppose a Cygwin version would be useful if you wanted to test or > > develop things that are destined for a 2.x/Unix machine. I also don't > > know what's involved with compiling 2.x for Cygwin. Maybe after 1.x and > > the modules are out... > > OK, my reason for asking was because I currently have apr and apr-util > packages pending, so if anyone was to package Apache 2, I'd need to > co-ordinate with them. I have actually got a working cygwin apache 2 to > compile, but it was quite messy, and I have no time to tidy it up at the > moment. Ah, of course. I'll contact you before I start packaging 2.x, if ever. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/