Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40B5B751.9EB8E456@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 02:39:29 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Looking for new apache maintainer References: <20040525234836 DOT GA2243 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <40B53400 DOT 668ECCEF AT dessent DOT net> <000b01c443cb$c6c0e950$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Max Bowsher wrote: > > Brian Dessent wrote: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> Is anyone interested in being the maintainer for the Apache package? > >> The current maintainer is MIA. > > > > I would like to volunteer for this. > > Hi Brian, > > Do you intend to maintain Apache 1 or Apache 2? I hadn't planned to package 2.x because its native win32 version would be significantly faster with a thread MPM than a Cygwin port. But I suppose a Cygwin version would be useful if you wanted to test or develop things that are destined for a 2.x/Unix machine. I also don't know what's involved with compiling 2.x for Cygwin. Maybe after 1.x and the modules are out... Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/