Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00ba01c43f74$50560f30$64fda287@docbill002> From: "Bill C. Riemers" To: References: <6 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20040521150946 DOT 03262f68 AT pop DOT theworld DOT com> <20040521192359 DOT GA6832 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <20040521203759 DOT GB7790 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> Subject: ftruncate64() question? Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:43:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings. I am trying to write a program using cygwin that truncates files larger than 4GB to a specific size as part of its functionality. However, I cannot find a ftruncate64() in the cygwin libraries. Are there other alternatives available? BTW. Normally I would search the cygwin archives for the answer, but for the past four weeks or so, when I try to follow links with search results to www.cygwin.com I just get a screen that tells me it thinks my browser, IE 6.0, is a spambot. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Re: where is at at? > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 04:17:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Fri, 21 May 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 May 2004 16:04:36 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >>>On Fri, 21 May 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:10:41PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: > >>>>>True. Please submit a patch with your intended changes. ;-) > >>>> > >>>>If this keeps going, I foresee that someone will be wearing an eye > >>>>patch from the ensuing violence. > >>> > >>>Hmm, I wonder if Cygwin's patchutils can manipulate eye patches... > >> > >>Only the latest version, which was updated to deal with the problem of > >>massive online piracy. When can we expect a newer Cygwin package? > > > >Gee, I hope they also fixed espdiff... The previous versions all had a > >bug where it couldn't detect any brain activity. I mean, it's *got* to > >work for someone, right? :-) > > Well, my brain hurts so maybe it is working somewhere. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/