Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:22:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with pty allocation code, race condition? Message-ID: <20040521022228.GA31667@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200405171330 DOT i4HDUtfu010131 AT mx1 DOT cs DOT umb DOT edu> <20040517164018 DOT GA9290 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 06:08:01PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Mon, 17 May 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:29:44AM -0400, John P. Rouillard wrote: >> >Does the last cygwin snapshot contain any code changes in the pty >> >allocation area? >> >> Yes, the very latest snapshot attempts to fix this problem. Please give >> it a try and report the results here. > >I'm sorry to report that the problem I described in > (multiple xterms >started in quick succession get the same PTY) still exists in the 20040519 >snapshot. The output of "ps" after reproducing it with 4 xterms is below, >if it's of any help (the last bash, PID 1948, is a console). And, now I finally receive this email... Amazing. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/