Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:45:36 +0300 From: Baurjan Ismagulov To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: user-specific mounts Message-ID: <20040517104534.GA7169@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040513122250 DOT GA13116 AT ata DOT cs DOT hacettepe DOT edu DOT tr> <20040514090839 DOT GB19350 AT ata DOT cs DOT hacettepe DOT edu DOT tr> <20040514182326 DOT GB10982 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-IsSubscribed: yes Hello, Igor! On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:14:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I did try it. I should have amended the above with "on my system, mounts > work as expected, with user mounts shadowing the system ones". In fact, > mount actually gives a warning that "system mount point of '/...' will > always be masked by user mount." But there's got to be some explanation > for the behavior the OP is seeing... As I test many installations simultaneously, I've created cmd scripts adding/removing registry entries for each installation. They normally stop all services, but I've forgotten about a rsync --daemon, started manually, so the new registry entries were not taken into account immediately. Sorry, and thanks much for your help! With kind regards, Baurjan. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/