Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:23:26 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: user-specific mounts Message-ID: <20040514182326.GB10982@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040513122250 DOT GA13116 AT ata DOT cs DOT hacettepe DOT edu DOT tr> <20040514090839 DOT GB19350 AT ata DOT cs DOT hacettepe DOT edu DOT tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:10:40PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >According to mount_info::from_registry() (in path.cc), the user mounts >are read before the system ones, and therefore appear earlier in the >mount table. I'm pretty sure the mount table is accessed linearly, so >the earlier items take precedence, but it would be nice if someone >confirmed this. Why not just "try it"? Create two mounts, one user and one system. See which takes precedence. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/