Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20040503224923.0313a5e0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 22:51:00 -0400
To: Jacek Trzmiel <sc0rp AT hot DOT pl>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: shutdown( socket, SHUT_WR ) - unexpected behaviour
In-Reply-To: <4096FDAA.48D577A2@hot.pl>
References: <40941F92 DOT 1DDD3E67 AT hot DOT pl> <20040503114446 DOT GE2201 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <4096FDAA DOT 48D577A2 AT hot DOT pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 10:19 PM 5/3/2004, you wrote:

>> I've tried your application and I'm not able to reproduce your problem.
>> The shutdown call does not influence sending the buffered data apparently.
>
>Thanks for info.
>
>> I've tested with Cygwin 1.5.9 and with a recent snapshot on XP SP1.
>> What's your system?
>
>Cygwin 1.5.9, Win2kSP2.  I made additional test using winsock directly
>and got the same buggy result.  So it doesn't look like bug in cygwin,
>but rather in windows or some 3rd party app that is messing with the
>sockets (e.g. NIS).  I found similar bugreport in MS KB298871, but it's
>marked as WinCE only:
>
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;298871
>
>"If an application calls shutdown() to disable only sending from the
>socket, later attempts to read data sent to that socket will result in
>only portions of the data being received."
>
>
>Can somebody with Win2k box compile and run prog from my previous mail?
>I would like to know if it behaves incorrectly only on my system, or on
>Win2k in general:


I don't know if this answers the question or not but it works fine for
me on W2K SP3 (Cygwin 1.5.9 yada, yada)...



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/