Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40967CDD.2040100@cs.york.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 18:09:49 +0100 From: chris jefferson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: electa CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now? References: <20040503135454 DOT GH2201 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes electa wrote: >i have used >#include >but gcc still prints >"implicit declaration of function lrand48()", >and "srand48()". > > > > Just checking, are you using the "-mno-cygwin" flag on gcc/g++? This would cause that error. If so, then you are using mingw and should really go and ask them why it doesn't work (and I suspect they'll tell you it is because it's not in the standard windows c library). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/