Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <409620F0.9050807@x-ray.at> Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 12:37:36 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 MultiZilla/1.5.0.4h MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'Cygwin List'" Subject: Re: How to set the colors of terminfo's standout mode? References: <4095147F DOT 2000300 AT x-ray DOT at> <00fb01c430e1$a95f0c90$647ba8c0 AT wanadoo DOT nl> In-Reply-To: <00fb01c430e1$a95f0c90$647ba8c0@wanadoo.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hornet.mur.at X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-IsSubscribed: yes Frank Slootweg schrieb: > Reini Urban wrote: >>Frank Slootweg schrieb: >> >>> A better solution would be one which 1) does *not* hardcode the >>>colors, 2) *does* use inverse video ("7") and 3) displays >>>white-on-black. >> >>Oh god, this man is insisting. >>The default white color on terms without being able to change faces is >>lightgrey! >>White is used for bold on such stupid terms, which is a more important >>emphasis to have than white. >> >>Or how to define bold white then? >>Some better terminals, like rxvt, know how to render Courier-Bold or >>Lucida-Bold, but CMD.EXE not. >>Since our default is CMD.EXE and not rxvt, your desiderations (white >>on black) are bogus. > > > Well, as my test showed, I *can* do white by bolding ("1"). The point > is that when combined with inverse/reverse video ("7"), the background > color is not black but dark-grey. What is your explanation for the > background being dark-grey for inverse/reverse video? Because it is *bold* then, and bold with CMD.EXE ANSI.SYS (or COMMAND.COM + ANSI.SYS) changes the color and doesn't change the face. > As to my "bogus desiderations", the concept of inverse (or reverse) > video already exists since the seventies (or earlier), and, as I wrote > in my basenote and later reproduced with simple echo(1) commands, Cygwin > B20 has *no* problems with it, so it is not a question of the 'terminal' > (i.e. CMD.EXE in my case) being too limited, but of Cygwin. The new cgywin does it _right_ according to my explanation, favoring boldness over color-matching. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/