Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40923F9D.7070809@ompf.org> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:59:25 +0200 From: tbp <gcc AT ompf DOT org> Reply-To: gcc AT ompf DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ross Ridge <rridge AT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca> CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues References: <20040430080013 DOT 04A6EA854E AT perpugilliam DOT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca> In-Reply-To: <20040430080013.04A6EA854E@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ross Ridge wrote: > Try reversing this patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8 Patched gcc 3.4 + patched cygwin1.dll = success. Thanks a lot. So, i have to ask 2 annoying questions: a) is Brian Ford patch to threadfunc_fe gonna make it to the official cygwin at some point in one form or another? b) what can be done about the gcc/binutil thing? Should i raise the issue with the binutils and/or gcc ppl or just sit on it? PS: Excuse my ignorance, but is there a way to keep a local copy of cygwin1.dll without getting caught by the cygwin-system-consistency police? -- Regards, tbp. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/