Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <40923F9D.7070809@ompf.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:59:25 +0200
From: tbp <gcc AT ompf DOT org>
Reply-To: gcc AT ompf DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Ridge <rridge AT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues
References: <20040430080013 DOT 04A6EA854E AT perpugilliam DOT csclub DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>
In-Reply-To: <20040430080013.04A6EA854E@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ross Ridge wrote:
> Try reversing this patch:
> 
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
Patched gcc 3.4 + patched cygwin1.dll = success. Thanks a lot.

So, i have to ask 2 annoying questions:
a) is Brian Ford patch to threadfunc_fe gonna make it to the official 
cygwin at some point in one form or another?
b) what can be done about the gcc/binutil thing? Should i raise the 
issue with the binutils and/or gcc ppl or just sit on it?


PS: Excuse my ignorance, but is there a way to keep a local copy of 
cygwin1.dll without getting caught by the cygwin-system-consistency police?

-- 
Regards,
	tbp.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/