Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:53:57 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fetchmail/procmail lost messages Message-ID: <20040423125357.GB1724@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040423005903 DOT GA444 AT knuckles> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040423005903.GA444@knuckles> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Kelly, On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:59:06PM -0700, Kelly Felkins wrote: > For example, today the hard drive that I use for both the spool file > and my mail boxes was off-line. Five messages to /dev/null. > > I'm inclined to think this is a bad design. Or have I got it > configured incorrectly? Possibly. I highly recommend using a spool file that is *always* on-line (e.g., /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME). Nevertheless, fetchmail should not have flushed the message if procmail exited with a nonzero status. BTW, I have used Cygwin fetchmail/procmail to process my mail for about 3 years. I process more 10,000 emails per month. So, I have processed more than 300,000 messages during this time period. AFAICT, I have not lost a single message. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/