Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <476AFB33B6D50B4286FB94A671FC779E0392EC@COXML1.cox.co.uk>
From: "Hughes, Bill" <Bill DOT Hughes AT cox DOT co DOT uk>
To: "'Dave Korn'" <dk AT artimi DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: [OT] Email address. Re: i want to re-download all packages... how?
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:33:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

> Sent: 23 April 2004 11:52  From: Dave Korn 
..snip..
>   There's a broad concensus among the spamfighting community 
> that there
> isn't actually any email-address-snarfing software out there 
> that actually
> does bother to attempt to demunge addresses.  When non-munged 
> addresses are
> out there to be spidered off the web and hoovered up from 
> usenet by their
> tens of millions, why bother going to the effort of writing 
> extra code, when
> the spammers can already get more addresses than they know 
> what to do with
> anyway?
I'd concur, until everyone mungs their address (I can't at work) there's
little incentive for the spammers to bother. It's an interesting point to
consider - why would a spammer _want_ to decode a munged email as this
clearly shows that the addressee doesn't want spam and the only likely
response is going to be Spamcop et al? Of course that pre-supposes any
intelligence on the part of spammers which is even more debateable.
 
>   Seriously, it really seems to be the case that it just 
> doesn't happen to
> any significant extent.
Yet, but I hope I'm wrong.


>   Talk to n.a.n.a.e for more information.
YJM!
There my be people of tender years on this list who shouldn't be exposed to
nanae, of course nanau is arguably worse. Hmm, I'm going to check for
a.f.cygwin when I get home (or a.f.$DEVNAME...)

Some people may think cgf is a bit tetchy sometimes (normally with good
reason) but they obviously haven't spent much time on usenet.
My favourite is sci.physics.relativity for truly staggering levels of wilful
ignorance and perversity.

Thanks Dave, you brought back some happy memories :-)

Bill

--


This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance
on it. If you have received this email in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we
are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network.

The views expressed in this email are not that of the company unless
specified within the message.

The inclusion of this footnote indicates that the mail message and any
attachments have been checked for the presence of known viruses.

If you have any comments regarding our policy please direct them to
postmaster AT cox DOT co DOT uk
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/