Message-Id: <200404230432.i3N4WTSi031967@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "GARY VANSICKLE" To: Subject: RE: Maildir and Cygwin Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:33:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20040422164005.GA3652@efn.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > > > :) > that Cygwin is different (e.g. we could do this in the cygwin > > :) > applications mailing list). > > :) > > :) Why do you want to change so many programs when all you need is a > > :) cygwin managed mount? > > IMO, the correct solution for mutt to make everyone happy would be a > new configuration variable to specify the character (presumably > defaulting to non-: for cygwin). I think I've seen both ; and - > suggested in different places. No, all that would do is guarantee that a mutt using ";" couldn't read a Maildir written by a fetchmail using "-" (i.e. the disagreement would simply move from being hardcoded to being defined at compile time). The correct solution is to implement a corrected spec. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/