Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:00:41 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Souldn't we put [cygwin] or [CygXwin] here depending on the question? Message-ID: <20040417000041.GA5462@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040416200951 DOT GA13791 AT coe DOT bosbc DOT com> <40801738 DOT 12970 DOT 48BEFA44 AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40801738.12970.48BEFA44@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:26:16PM -0600, E. Weddington wrote: >On 16 Apr 2004 at 16:09, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Sorry. The list administrator is not interested in having *his* email >>cluttered with extraneous words in the subject. >> >>It is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. Is that clear? No amount of pleading is >>going to change the policy in any group that I run. > >Um, shouldn't you check with your *co-project lead* too? > So, you're assuming that Corinna and I don't communicate? That's very odd. Anyway, I said "group" (as in new"group" -- old usenet habits die hard) when I meant "mailing list" but, no, I don't have to check with Corinna. Even if she didn't agree with me on this subject (and I am sure she does), I know that she would defer to me on this topic. I didn't think it was really worth going to the effort of checking with her and issuing a joint press release to end this tedious thread. Anyway, the thread is now done. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/