Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "E. Weddington" <eric AT ecentral DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:26:16 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Souldn't we put [cygwin] or [CygXwin] here depending on the question?
Message-ID: <40801738.12970.48BEFA44@localhost>
In-reply-to: <20040416200951.GA13791@coe.bosbc.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 2003.09.17 on emu

On 16 Apr 2004 at 16:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Sorry.  The list administrator is not interested in having *his* email
> cluttered with extraneous words in the subject.
> 
> It is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.  Is that clear?  No amount of pleading is
> going to change the policy in any group that I run.

Um, shouldn't you check with your *co-project lead* too?
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg01568.html>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/