Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:09:51 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Souldn't we put [cygwin] or [CygXwin] here depending on the question? Message-ID: <20040416200951.GA13791@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <408031E1 DOT 7090601 AT netscape DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <408031E1.7090601@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:20:01PM -0400, Jim Scheef wrote: >I have been trying for weeks to find a way to sort these messages in >the Netscape 7 version of Mozilla Mail. Nothing has worked. Adding a >consistent flag to the subject line like [cygwin] would make the >sorting trivial. If it took the list administrator 15 minutes to make >this change, it could save the list users many man-years of effort >trying to make the filtering work in their email clients. Sorry. The list administrator is not interested in having *his* email cluttered with extraneous words in the subject. It is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. Is that clear? No amount of pleading is going to change the policy in any group that I run. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/