Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <F76C9B2DA2FC4C4CA0A18E288BBCBCF7082177D1@nihexchange24.nih.gov>
From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)" <BBuchbinder AT niaid DOT nih DOT gov>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: co-linux
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:45:44 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> * Dave Korn <qx AT negvzv DOT pbz> [2004-04-14 12:55:10 +0100]:
>
>> I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on
>> windows). Is this product going to kill cygwin.  What will be the
>> benefits of using cygwin in that case.
>
>   Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one.

The way I read the site <http://www.colinux.org/>, it is Linux, not Unix.
They are loading a Linux kernel, not Unix.  See also
<http://www.colinux.org/wiki/index.php/coLinuxFAQ#A2>

Also ...
- it won't on Win9x/Me
<http://www.colinux.org/wiki/index.php/coLinuxFAQ#A11>
- they support only Win2K/XP, not NT
<http://www.colinux.org/?section=status>
- they currently suggest Cygwin/X for an X-server
<http://www.colinux.org/wiki/index.php/coLinuxFAQ#A4>.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/