Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, "Dave Korn" Subject: Re: co-linux Reply-To: sds AT gnu DOT org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never From: Sam Steingold In-Reply-To: (Dave Korn's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:55:10 +0100") References: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, "Dave Korn" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:34:09 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain > * Dave Korn [2004-04-14 12:55:10 +0100]: > >> I have just read about beta release of co-linux (linux on >> windows). Is this product going to kill cygwin. What will be the >> benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one. This is confusing. Unix is a class of OSes. Linux is an instance of that class. The syntax of your sentence implies that, when you say Unix, you mean an instance, not the class. Which instance? SCO UNIX? AIX? Solaris? HP-UX? Apparently SCO (the others do not have `Unix' in the name). Cygwin is (arguably) another instance of the Unix class, based largely on the same codebase as Linux (cygwin1.dll and libc are different, apparently, but, IIUC, bash, ls, cp &c are the same). Could you please clarify what you are trying to say? Thanks. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/