Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: co-linux Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:57:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <87fzb6lmhu.fsf@peder.flower> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2004 13:57:32.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[6ED510F0:01C42228] > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Sent: 14 April 2004 14:26 > Dave Korn writes: > > >> What will be the benefits of using cygwin in that case. > > > > Having a Unix-alike, rather than a Linux-alike, for one. > > Yah, Unix was so much cooler than Linux. Dunno how you managed to read that into my post. All I said was that Unix != Linux. Depending on what the application is, someone might want a unix-alike rather than a Linux system, because they aren't the same thing. Fairly simple to understand, I thought: the fact that you've read it as some kind of value judgement suggests you're projecting your own preconceived notions into my words. > Don't we all pine for those > times, where we would make all kinds of interesting workarounds for > non-POSIX compliant /bin/sh's that came without that silly stuff > called source code. > > Jan. > /still failing to see why Cygwin has that same coolness factor Chill, dude. You got issues or something? Get that chip off your shoulder! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/