Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Alex Vinokur" Subject: Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:32:11 +0300 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <407C0198 DOT 4000707 AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk> X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-166-121-61.barak.net.il X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 "Hans Horn" wrote in message news:c5h1k7$cl$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org... > Quite interesting indeed! > > Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x (cygwin), etc > against the gcc2.9x vintage? See "C/C++ Program Perfometer : Tool for measuring comparative performance of the C/C++ code " http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bm9216%24jvo98%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de > > H. > "chris" wrote in message > news:407C0198 DOT 4000707 AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk... > > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > > > ======================================== > > > Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers > > > C/C++ Performance Tests > > > ========================================= > > > [snip] -- Alex Vinokur mailto:alexvn AT connect DOT to http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/