Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:04:56 +0100
From: chris <caj AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Vinokur <alexvn AT connect DOT to>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)
References: <c5gkcl$m1c$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <c5gkcl$m1c$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Alex Vinokur wrote:

>        ========================================
>        Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers
>        C/C++ Performance Tests
>        =========================================
>
>  
>
<snip>

While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really 
running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what 
differences are due to startup time and due to runtime. How about a 
couple of extra jobs, one of which runs for 1 minute and one for 2?



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/