Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Alex Vinokur" Subject: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:53:57 +0300 Lines: 39 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-166-120-104.barak.net.il X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 ======================================== Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers C/C++ Performance Tests ========================================= Environment ----------- Windows 2000 Professional Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.70 GHz Compilers --------- * GNU g++ 3.3.1 (cygming special), Cygwin * GNU g++ 3.3.1 (cygming special), Mingw32 Interface * GNU gpp 3.3.2 (djgpp) * Microsoft C++ 13.00.9466 (Unmanaged) * Microsoft C++ 13.00.9466 (Managed) * Borland C++ 5.5.1 * Digital Mars C++ 8.40.2 * Intel C++ 8.0 Testsuites ---------- * Computing very large Fibonacci numbers http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.perfometer/37 * Copying files (input to output) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.perfometer/38 -- Alex Vinokur mailto:alexvn AT connect DOT to http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/