Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [67.9.128.143]
X-Originating-Email: [lingua2003 AT hotmail DOT com]
X-Sender: lingua2003 AT hotmail DOT com
From: "David" <lingua2003 AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <1FFD627BFDAEE0468AA006E0AD632470138E1D AT uncl-mail DOT caa DOT army DOT mil> <20040331142404 DOT GP17229 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <406B995A DOT 5080503 AT x-ray DOT at> <20040401043612 DOT GA6961 AT coc DOT bosbc DOT com> <406C0651 DOT 9010707 AT x-ray DOT at> <20040401144417 DOT GA4809 AT coc DOT bosbc DOT com> <BAY14-DAV20uejzpOIO00001d75 AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject: Souldn't we put [Cygwin] or [CygXwin] here depending on the question?
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:21:50 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <BAY14-DAV27pHToG3AS00001ed0@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2004 15:21:50.0997 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E759C50:01C417FD]
X-IsSubscribed: yes

I got mails from both two groups:cygwin, and cygXwin.
It's sometimes confusing.

Don't we need to seperate one from the other by putting
a head into Subject, for example, [cygwin] vs. [cygXwin]?

Just an opinion, as a beginner ^^

David

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/