Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "David Rayner" To: "Peter A. Castro" Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:37:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.0-1 Reply-to: david AT rayninfo DOT co DOT uk CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <406931B6.16915.245D43@localhost> In-reply-to: References: <22ag60ps55ncebbc9dm2u1lele15os5mpp AT 4ax DOT com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-description: Mail message body Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from Quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i2U7bfqV016780 Peter, There is a posting in Gmane which explains that it's a packaging error >Sounds like a packaging bug. And right you are: $ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done #!/bin/sh V=4.1.1 ^^^^^^^ Should be 4.2.0 prefix=/usr infodir=${prefix}/share/info [snip] # Install default zprofile if needed if [ ! -f /etc/zprofile ]; then echo "Installing default /etc/zprofile" install -c -m 755 /usr/doc/zsh-$V/StartupFiles/zprofile ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Should be /usr/share/doc [snip] -- Alejandro López-Valencia Date sent: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:47:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Peter A. Castro" To: zzapper Copies to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.0-1 > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote: > > > > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote: > > > > > >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be > > >>at a mirror near you real soon. > > >> > > >Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morning when I ran my daily setup > > >however (having reset my PC as requested) > > > > > >zsh --version > > >zsh 4.1.1 (i686-pc-cygwin) > > > > > >>whence zsh > > >/usr/bin/zsh > > > > > I had to rename zsh-4.2.0.exe to zsh.exe myself (is that > > normal/correct?) > > You should not have to rename anything. A normal upgrade of any package > under Cygwin will first uninstall/remove the old files (thus there will > be no /usr/bin/zsh) before the new package in unpacked. That is, unless > setup messed up and didn't remove the old files. > > I've done several upgrades and fresh installs and have not seen the > problem you describe above. BTW, /usr/bin/zsh is a symlink to > zsh-4.2.0.exe, so don't rename it, simply point the symlink to the > correct exe name. > > > zzapper (vim, cygwin, wiki & zsh) > > -- > Peter A. Castro or > "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood -- Best Regards David Rayner MSc CEng Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione quadraturae circuli. http://www.rayninfo.co.uk/blogger.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/