Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040326141321.03fb8c08@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:17:54 -0500 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: cygwin under Wine? In-Reply-To: <20040326182314.GA4657@redhat.com> References: <1080290706 DOT 29782 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040326125328 DOT 03fa87b8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <20040326182314 DOT GA4657 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:23 PM 3/26/2004, you wrote: >On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:56:16PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >>Sounds good to me. But as long as we're clarifying things, we do have to >>respect that the above motivation is OT for the list as Chris mentioned. >>It would be appreciated if future responders to Thomas's inquiry could >>direct their comments to him rather than this list. > >No, I retracted my statement about this being off-topic. > >While, sending email to the cygwin list as a method for contacting other >IBM employees is off-topic (as was noted), I can't honestly say that asking >questions like "cygwin under Wine" is anything other than a valid request >for information. Right. I should have been more clear. I was responding to the part of Tom's post where he indicated he was looking for feedback from IBM Cygwin users (which he originally requested as off-list feedback). -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/